While 20th-century communist regimes largely collapsed, various organizations continue to promote or maintain ideological affiliation with core communist principles, often under rebranded labels such as democratic socialism or anti-capitalism.
These groups frequently echo the economic critiques and strategic approaches analyzed throughout this site: collective ownership of key industries, skepticism toward markets, institutional capture, and viewing capitalism as a system to be replaced rather than reformed. While not all openly advocate violent revolution, their platforms and internal factions often reveal direct continuity with historical Marxist-Leninist thought.
Many of the groups discussed use or tolerate historic communist symbols as markers of ideological continuity. These visuals often appear in protests, social media, literature, and organizational branding.
Traditional emblem of the union of industrial workers (hammer) and agricultural peasants (sickle). Widely used by CPUSA, PSL, and factional materials within DSA.
Symbol of revolutionary leadership and the guiding role of the vanguard party. Common in Leninist and Maoist iconography; appears in many communist party logos and protest signage.
Represents solidarity, resistance, and class struggle. Ubiquitous across socialist and communist movements; frequently seen at DSA and allied events.
Classic banner of revolution and the working class. Still flown at rallies by explicitly communist organizations and in solidarity actions.
DSA describes capitalism as “a system designed by the owning class to exploit the rest of us for their own profit.” It calls for replacing it with democratic socialism featuring collective ownership of key sectors and “democratic planning.”
DSA prioritizes the “long march through institutions” — capturing labor unions, education, local government, and the Democratic Party. It frames reforms (Green New Deal, Medicare for All) as transitional steps toward post-capitalist society. It revisits the Communist Manifesto as relevant today and maintains an “anti-anti-Communist” heritage.
Several prominent DSA members and endorsed candidates have made statements that echo or directly parallel foundational communist positions on capitalism, policing, and international issues. Examples include:
These statements often frame issues through lenses of class struggle, decolonization, and systemic overthrow that mirror elements of historical communist rhetoric (e.g., viewing institutions as tools of oppression, capitalism as irredeemable, reforms as steps toward larger transformation). DSA has at times conditioned or withdrawn support from candidates seen as insufficiently aligned. See also the comparison table in the Modern Risks section.
Openly Marxist-Leninist. Advocates “a socialist USA” through a combination of electoral work and mass movements. Maintains fraternal ties with communist parties abroad and continues to defend aspects of 20th-century communist history while criticizing “distortions.”
Revolutionary Marxist-Leninist groups that explicitly support historical communist states (Cuba, China, DPRK, Venezuela) and call for the overthrow of capitalism. Active in protests and “anti-imperialist” coalitions.
Parties in Greece (KKE), Portugal (PCP), Spain, and France maintain explicit Marxist-Leninist platforms and participate in electoral politics while advocating nationalization, exit from NATO/EU structures in some cases, and solidarity with regimes like Cuba and Venezuela.
Groups and governments influenced by “21st Century Socialism” or Bolivarian Alliance continue to promote heavy state intervention, expropriation, and anti-imperialist rhetoric rooted in communist analysis. Academic and activist networks in the West often provide ideological and material support.